Organization | • | Illinois Labor Relations Board | [X] |
| | 381: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2017 April | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | International Association of Firefighters, Local 413, AFL-CIO, CLC -vs- City of Rockford: On September 12, 2014, the International Association of Firefighters, Local 413 (Union)filed an unfair labor practice charge with the State Panel of the Illinois Labor Relations Board alleging that the City of Rockford (Employer) violated Sections 10(a)(4) and (1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315, as amended (Act) by refusing to include language on medical certification in the parties successor collective bargaining agreement. The Boards Executive Director issued a Complaint for Hearing and the matter was initially assigned to Administrative Law Judge Kelly Coyle. The case was later reassigned to Administrative Law Judge Anna Hamburg-Gal (ALJ), who conducted a hearing on January 6, 2016. | | | | Date Created: | 04-11-2017 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. S-CA-15-030 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059809 Original UID: 181170 FIRST WORD: Decisions | |
| 382: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 December | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | James W. Young -vs- Village of University Park: On August 26, 2016, Administrative Law Judge Deena Sanceda, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter.No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its December 13, 2016 public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter,declined to take it up on its own motion. | | | | Date Created: | 12-14-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. S-CA-14-107 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059810 Original UID: 181171 FIRST WORD: Decisions | |
| 383: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 August | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Wheaton Firefighters Union, Local 3706 (the Union), and the City of Wheaton (the City) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement. In 2012, after failed negotiations, the Union invoked interest arbitration pursuant to section 14 of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (the Act)(5 ILCS 315/14 (West 2012)). During the interest arbitration proceedings, the City sought to add a provision to the parties' agreement that would allow it to unilaterally change the health insurance benefits that is was providing to the Union's members during the period of the agreement. The Union responded by filing an unfair-labor charge against the City, arguing that the City was acting in bad faith by submitting an inappropriate matter to interest arbitration. The Illinois Labor Relations Board found that the City had not acted in bad faith, because the City's mere submission of its health insurance proposal to interest arbitration did not demonstrate that the City violated the Act. the Union appeals from the order. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. | | | | Date Created: | 08-22-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. S-CA-14-067; No. 2-16-0105; IL App (2d) 160105 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059815 Original UID: 181176 FIRST WORD: Decisions | |
| 384: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 October | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Service Employees International Union, Local 73 -vs- Village of Dixmoor: On December 17, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Kelly Coyle (ALJ) issued a Recommended Decision and Order (RDO) in this case, recommending that the State Panel of the Illinois Labor Relations Board (Board) find that Respondent, Village of Dixmoor (Respondent or Village) violated Sections 10(a) (4) and (1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315, as amended (Act). Specifically, the ALJ determined that the Village had violated the Act by unilaterally closing its Fire Department and subcontracting bargaining unit work, and byunilaterally laying off bargaining unit employees,1 as charged by the Service EmployeesInternational Union, Local 73 (Charging Party or Union). | | | | Date Created: | 10-03-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. S-CA-14-063 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059829 Original UID: 181191 FIRST WORD: Decisions | |
| 385: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 April | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Dwyane McCann -vs- Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel; County of Will, Land Use Department; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31: This case involves the employment termination of petitioner, Dwyane McCann, by respondent, County of Will Land Use Department (Employer). McCann appeals the Illinois Labor Relations Board State Panel's (State Panel) affirmation of the Illinois Labor Relations Board's (Board) dismissal of his causes of action filed against (1) the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME) for incompetent, ineffective, and inefficient union representation and against (2) Employer for unfair labor practices within the meaning of section 10(a) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act. (5 ILCS 315/10(a)(West 2012)) For the foregoing reasons, we confirm. | | | | Date Created: | 08-03-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Appeal No. 3-15-0686; Case No. S-CA-14-025; Case No. S-CA-14-189 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059830 Original UID: 181192 FIRST WORD: Decisions | |
| 386: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 August | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | This case involves a labor dispute between a union and an Illinois municipal employer under the Public Labor Relations Act (Act)(5 ILCS 315/10(a)(West 2006)). In 2009, the Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel (Board), found that the Village of Oak Lawn (Village) committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the Oak Lawn Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3405 (union), over minimum manning requirements -- a mandatory bargaining subject -- and ordered the Village to rescind any changes it made to shift staffing and make whole any employees who incurred losses due to the violation. An arbitrator held a hearing and reviewed the bargaining agreement. The arbitrator ordered the Village to pay $285,866.72 in back pay to the employees it did not call in for overtime to meet the minimum manning requriement. | | | | Date Created: | 08-12-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. S-CA-09-007-C; Appeal No. 1-15-3483 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059831 Original UID: 181193 FIRST WORD: Decisions | |
| 387: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 June | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 -vs- County of Cook and Sheriff of Cook County -vs- Metropolitan Alliance of Police, Chapter 438: On March 6, 2016, Administrative Law Judge, Kelly Coyle (ALJ) issued a Recommended Decision and Order (RDO) dismissing the above-captioned case. On September 24, 2014, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME or Union) filed a petition with the Local Panel of the Illinois Labor Relations Board (Board) seeking to clarify the unit, certified by the Board in Case No. L-RC-02-005, pursuant to the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended (Act), and the Rules andRegulations of of the Board, 80 Ill. Admin. Code, Parts 1200 through 1300 (Rules) to include Sergeants in the Electronic Monitoring (EM) Unit, employed by the County of Cook and Sheriff of Cook County (Joint Employer). The petition was precipitated by the Employersreorganization that moved EM Sgts. to another operating department staffed by bargaining unitmembers represented by AFSCME. The Intervenor, Metropolitan Alliance of Police, Local 438(MAP) opposed the petition on several bases, as detailed in the RDO, including that it is certified representative of the at-issue employees. | | | | Date Created: | 06-30-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-UC-15-003 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059877 Original UID: 181238 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 388: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 June | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 -vs- City of Chicago: On February 19, 2016, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), Deena Sanceda issued a Recommended Decision and Order (RDO) in which she detem1ined, among other things, that aprior agreement entered into between American Federation of State, County and MunicipalEmployees (AFSCME or Petitioner) and the City of Chicago (City or Employer) does not precludethe instant majority interest/representation petition filed by AFSCME with the Local Panel of the Illinois Labor Relations Board (Board) pursuant to the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended (Act), and the Rules and Regulations of the Board, 80 Ill. Admin. Code, Parts 1200 through 1300 (Rules) seeking to add a title to an existing bargaining unit. The City filed timely exceptions challenging only that aspect of the RDO; AFSCME filed a timely response. | | | | Date Created: | 07-01-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-RC-16-007 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059878 Original UID: 181239 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 389: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 August 25 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Chicago Joint Board, Local 200, RWDSU, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union -vs- Illinois Labor Relations Board, Local Panel, County of Cook (Health and Hospitals System): This case is before us on direct review of an administrative order entered by respondent Illinois Labor Relations Board, Local Panel (ILRB), dismissing a petition seeking union representation. Petitioner Chicago Joint Board, Local 200, RWDSU, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (the Union) appeals from the administrative decision of respondent ILRB finding that pharmacy supervisors are supervisors within the meaning of section 3(r) of the Labor Relations Act (the Act)(5 ILCS 315/3(r)(West 2012)). On appeal, the Union argues that the ILRB erred in adopting the findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ) that respondent employer, County of Cook (Health and Hospitals System)(CCHHS), met its burden of proof to show that pharmacy supervisors and supervisors undet section 3(r) of the Act because CCHHS did not establish that (1) pharmancy supervisors have the authority to effectively recommend discipline of their subordinates, (2) pharmacy supervisors direct their subordinates with independent judgment in the interest of the employer, and (3) pharmacy supervisors spend a preponderance of their working time engaged in supervisory functions. | | | | Date Created: | 10-31-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-RC-14-018; No. 1-15-2770 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059879 Original UID: 181240 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 390: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 September | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Darryl Spratt -vs- Amalgamated Transit Union, Lcoal 241:
On July 5, 2016, Melissa Mlynski, Executive Director of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, dismissed the above-captioned charge, finding that Charging Party, Darryl Spratt, had failed to raise an issue of law or fact sufficient to warrant a hearing. | | | | Date Created: | 09-19-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CB-16-047 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000059880 Original UID: 181241 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
|
